1957 AC Aceca vs. 1998 Bentley Turbo
To start off, 1998 Bentley Turbo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Bentley Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Bentley Turbo (395 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Bentley Turbo should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Bentley Turbo weights approximately 1505 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 1998 Bentley Turbo | |
Make | AC | Bentley |
Model | Aceca | Turbo |
Year Released | 1957 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 94 L |