1957 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001
To start off, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 (500 HP) has 375 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 weights approximately 306 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 AC Aceca | 2000 Bizzarrini BZ-2001 | |
| Make | AC | Bizzarrini |
| Model | Aceca | BZ-2001 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 500 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2560 mm |
