1957 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Audi AL2
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi AL2 weights approximately 6 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca.
Because 1957 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 AC Aceca | 2001 Audi AL2 | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Aceca | AL2 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2470 mm |
