1957 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Audi S8
To start off, 2002 Audi S8 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi S8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi S8 weights approximately 856 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca.
Because 2002 Audi S8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi S8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi S8 (431 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2002 Audi S8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 AC Aceca | 2002 Audi S8 | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Aceca | S8 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 431 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 84.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 93 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |
