1957 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 728 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 2002 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Aceca | CTS |
Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3173 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1618 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 66 L |