1957 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca.
Because 1957 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Aceca | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2380 mm |