1957 AC Aceca vs. 2003 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2003 GMC Sierra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,816 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 GMC Sierra (275 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1051 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 GMC Sierra (386 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 AC Aceca. (167 Nm). This means 2003 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 2003 GMC Sierra | |
Make | AC | GMC |
Model | Aceca | Sierra |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4816 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 386 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3380 mm |