1957 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Buick Regal
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick Regal weights approximately 708 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 2004 Buick Regal | |
Make | AC | Buick |
Model | Aceca | Regal |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 64 L |