1957 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-350 weights approximately 76 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | E-350 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 15 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 132 L |