1957 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (227 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 AC Aceca | 2009 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | AC | Land Rover |
| Model | Aceca | LR2 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1910 mm |
