1957 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 710 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 2012 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Aceca | Orlando |
Year Released | 1957 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2760 mm |