1957 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Aceca | ML |
Year Released | 1957 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2141 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1796 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 93 L |