1957 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 488 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1957 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1957 AC Aceca 2013 Mazda 3
Make AC Mazda
Model Aceca 3
Year Released 1957 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 890 kg 1378 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4595 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 55 L