1957 Allard GT vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2000 Tata E is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Allard GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Allard GT would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Allard GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Allard GT (210 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2000 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Allard GT should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata E weights approximately 230 kg more than 1957 Allard GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Allard GT (289 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Tata E. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1957 Allard GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Allard GT | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | Allard | Tata |
Model | GT | E |
Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 289 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2810 mm |