1957 Allard GT vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Allard GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Allard GT would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 633 more horse power than 1957 Allard GT. (210 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1957 Allard GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Allard GT weights approximately 60 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 701 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Allard GT. (289 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Allard GT.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Allard GT | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Allard | Lotec |
Model | GT | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 289 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1150 mm |