1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1962 Cadillac 62 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 154 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 537 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
Model | A 106 | 62 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 582 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 75 L |