1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (351 HP) has 308 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm) has 484 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A 106 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1957 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 6974 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 351 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 529 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 75 L |