1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 1980 Volvo 240 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 240 (152 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 240 (240 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 1980 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Alpine | Volvo |
Model | A 106 | 240 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 152 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 60 L |