1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (59 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 1957 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (96 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Alpine | Nissan |
Model | A 106 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1957 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 96 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1400 mm |