1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (124 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (181 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A 106 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1957 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 124 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 181 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1700 mm |