1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2000 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (123 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Wrangler (193 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2000 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2000 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Alpine | Jeep |
Model | A 106 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 2464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 193 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 57 L |