1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (74 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 577 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Alpine | Toyota |
Model | A 106 | Celica |
Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 87 L |