1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2002 Citroen C2
To start off, 2002 Citroen C2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Citroen C2 (67 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 1957 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Citroen C2 (150 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2002 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2002 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Alpine | Citroen |
Model | A 106 | C2 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 150 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 41 L |