1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,351 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mitsubishi Magna (142 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 1957 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mitsubishi Magna (205 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2002 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Alpine A 106 | 2002 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Alpine | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 106 | Magna |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 2351 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 142 HP |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 74 L |
