1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2002 Peugeot Sesame
To start off, 2002 Peugeot Sesame is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Peugeot Sesame is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 1957 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Peugeot Sesame (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (57 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2002 Peugeot Sesame will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Alpine A 106 | 2002 Peugeot Sesame | |
| Make | Alpine | Peugeot |
| Model | A 106 | Sesame |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1640 mm |
