1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106. 2003 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1957 Alpine A 106 has manual transmission. 1957 Alpine A 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1957 Alpine A 106 2003 Jaguar XJ
Make Alpine Jaguar
Model A 106 XJ
Year Released 1957 2003
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 747 cc 2968 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 43 HP 240 HP
Torque 45 Nm 293 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 3710 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1460 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 28 L 85 L