1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (251 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 106 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 74 L |