1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (98 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 1957 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (127 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Alpine | Renault |
Model | A 106 | Clio |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 98 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 50 L |