1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Alpine | Toyota |
Model | A 106 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 100 L |