1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (63 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 1957 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (125 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Alpine | Volkswagen |
Model | A 106 | Polo |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 125 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 45 L |