1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2009 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (252 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac SRX (254 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106. 2009 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1957 Alpine A 106 has manual transmission. 1957 Alpine A 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2009 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
Model | A 106 | SRX |
Year Released | 1957 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 254 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1850 mm |