1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 1957 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A 106 | HHR |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4475 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1603 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2629 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 61 L |