1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (310 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Dodge Ram has automatic transmission and 1957 Alpine A 106 has manual transmission. 1957 Alpine A 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Ram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Alpine A 106 | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Alpine | Dodge |
| Model | A 106 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 904 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5650 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 5817 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1908 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3569 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 98 L |
