1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 6,690 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (350 HP @ 3013 RPM) has 313 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A 106 | Ram |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 904 cc | 6690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3013 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 129 L |