1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Alpine A 106. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Alpine A 106 | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Alpine | Jeep |
| Model | A 106 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 904 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 205 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4138 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2103 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2423 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 70 L |
