1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 519 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Alpine A 106 | 2011 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A 106 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 904 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 68 L |
