1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP) has 383 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm) has 524 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Alpine A 106. (45 Nm). This means 2011 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Alpine A 106.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Alpine A 106 | 2011 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A 106 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1957 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 426 HP |
Torque | 45 Nm | 569 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1389 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 72 L |