1957 Alpine A 106 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1957 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1957 Alpine A 106.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1957 Alpine A 106 has manual transmission. 1957 Alpine A 106 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1957 Alpine A 106 2012 Cadillac CTS
Make Alpine Cadillac
Model A 106 CTS
Year Released 1957 2012
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 904 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 37 HP 270 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 7000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 3700 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2110 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 28 L 68 L