1957 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323.
Because 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Aston Martin DBR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Aston Martin DBR2 | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mazda |
Model | DBR2 | 323 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 55 L |