1957 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2009 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler 300. (215 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler 300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2009 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Chrysler |
Model | DBR2 | 300 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 72 L |