1957 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2010 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2010 Ford Expedition. (310 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Expedition.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2010 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DBR2 | Expedition |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4164 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 106 L |