1957 Aston Martin DBR2 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Aston Martin DBR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Mini |
| Model | DBR2 | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 47 L |
