1957 Austin A 35 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1385 kg more than 1957 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Calais (710 Nm) has 642 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 1969 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin A 35 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 35 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 710 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 82 L |
