1957 Austin A 35 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1969 Riley Kestrel is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 220 kg more than 1957 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Riley Kestrel (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1969 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin A 35 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Austin | Riley |
| Model | A 35 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 25 L |
