1957 Austin A 35 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1410 kg more than 1957 Austin A 35.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (461 Nm) has 393 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Austin A 35 | 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 35 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 461 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 64 L |
