1957 Austin A 35 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 804 kg more than 1957 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 35 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 35 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 3802 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1494 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 59 L |