1957 Austin A 35 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 879 kg more than 1957 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 35 | 2005 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 35 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1957 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1569 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 61 L |