1957 Austin A 35 vs. 2005 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 891 kg more than 1957 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 35 | 2005 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 35 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1957 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1581 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2930 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 70 L |