1957 Austin A 35 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 2023 kg more than 1957 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 497 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 35 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 35 | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 1957 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.4 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 2713 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 5662 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1918 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 117 L |