1957 Austin A 40 vs. 1969 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1969 Ford Fairlane is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1957 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1957 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 260 kg more than 1957 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Austin A 40 | 1969 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 40 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1957 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 40 L |